Kaufland website import

I want to propose importing Kaufland Websites in Czech Republic, using data on their first-party website, via All The Places dataset. The tricky part is that due to my mistake import mostly already happened. I am sorry for that, that is obviously a wrong order. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sorry-for-a-bot-edit-escaping-its-supposed-borders-adding-website-tags/135087 You can see affected objects on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/Czech_Republic_Kaufland If import will be rejected or not accepted, I will revert all such edits. If import will be accepted I will post changeset comments on relevant changesets explaining that it was in the end reviewed and accepted. And make future edits based on new matches, once they will be found. This is especially likely for newly opened shops. more detail is available at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/import_Kaufland_websites_in_Czech_Republic Please, comment if you either support this import or disagree with it.

I've looked into the documentation, data processing code and tests, and I am satisfied with the rigor you've put into. Thank you.

the report doesn't seem to be correct on Kaufland, so that's a bit deceiving - > https://matkoniecz.codeberg.page/improving_openstreetmap_using_alltheplaces_dataset/areas/50/14_index.html

I'd like to see a plaintext diff since osm.org and osmcha are not made for viewing sets of changesets. (not aware of a good tool) or script output that logs the changes being made

You are brave in using spaces in bot's name :)

I've looked into the documentation, data processing code and tests, and I am satisfied with the rigor you've put into. Thank you.

the report doesn't seem to be correct on Kaufland, so that's a bit deceiving - > https://matkoniecz.codeberg.page/improving_openstreetmap_using_alltheplaces_dataset/areas/50/14_index.html

I'd like to see a plaintext diff since osm.org and osmcha are not made for viewing sets of changesets. (not aware of a good tool) or script output that logs the changes being made

You are brave in using spaces in bot's name :)

I am happy you've included a QA section Martin

Dec 10, 2025, 22:18 by talk-cz na openstreetmap.org:

I've looked into the documentation, data processing code and tests, and I am satisfied with the rigor you've put into. Thank you.

Thanks for replies and I am obviously happy about response being positive so far :)

- the report doesn't seem to be correct on Kaufland, so that's a bit deceiving - https://matkoniecz.codeberg.page/improving_openstreetmap_using_alltheplaces_dataset/areas/50/14_index.html

which part seems to not be correct? note that my processing tries to make false negatives (avoid suggestions or import) rather than false positives

- I'd like to see a plaintext diff since osm.org and osmcha are not made for viewing sets of changesets. (not aware of a good tool) or script output that logs the changes being made

would plaintext list of tags modified would be good enough? ( locations of nodes were not changed by bot, nodes were not created, nodes were not added nor removed from ways, relation roles were not modified or added or removed etc)

- You are brave in using spaces in bot's name :)

This worked well, though code sits in directory path without any spaces :)

- I am happy you've included a QA section Martin

Sorry, regarding the report, I misunderstood, it shows only missing, not all matched which I was expecting. I think all the numbers you§d put on a Venn diagram would be useful to show. Yes, just plaintext. Something that could be checked or grepped without having to open up each node an a map, eg. n123456: +website:asdfg +opening_hours:12-34. I don't know if codeberg has runners but it would be could to have the script run as "action" and output log there and automatically saved and accessible. Just an idea - don't want to push you into some workflow that may not be practical in reality. Sent with > Proton Mail <https://proton.me/mail/home>> secure email. On Thursday, December 11th, 2025 at 12:03 AM, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz na tutanota.com> wrote:

Dec 10, 2025, 22:18 by talk-cz na openstreetmap.org:

I've looked into the documentation, data processing code and tests, and I am satisfied with the rigor you've put into. Thank you.

Thanks for replies and I am obviously happy about response being positive so far :)

the report doesn't seem to be correct on Kaufland, so that's a bit deceiving - >>> https://matkoniecz.codeberg.page/improving_openstreetmap_using_alltheplaces_dataset/areas/50/14_index.html

which part seems to not be correct? note that my processing tries to make false negatives (avoid suggestions or import) rather than false positives

I'd like to see a plaintext diff since osm.org and osmcha are not made for viewing sets of changesets. (not aware of a good tool) or script output that logs the changes being made

would plaintext list of tags modified would be good enough? ( locations of nodes were not changed by bot, nodes were not created, nodes were not added nor removed from ways, relation roles were not modified or added or removed etc)

You are brave in using spaces in bot's name :)

This worked well, though code sits in directory path without any spaces :)

I am happy you've included a QA section Martin

https://pastebin.com/axchy8yw should have listing you requested if any other data is needed - feel free to ask! Dec 11, 2025, 12:29 by talk-cz na openstreetmap.org:

Sorry, regarding the report, I misunderstood, it shows only missing, not all matched which I was expecting. I think all the numbers you§d put on a Venn diagram would be useful to show. Yes, just plaintext. Something that could be checked or grepped without having to open up each node an a map, eg. n123456: +website:asdfg +opening_hours:12-34. I don't know if codeberg has runners but it would be could to have the script run as "action" and output log there and automatically saved and accessible. Just an idea - don't want to push you into some workflow that may not be practical in reality. Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) secure email. On Thursday, December 11th, 2025 at 12:03 AM, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz na tutanota.com> wrote:

Dec 10, 2025, 22:18 by talk-cz na openstreetmap.org:

I've looked into the documentation, data processing code and tests, and I am satisfied with the rigor you've put into. Thank you.

Thanks for replies and I am obviously happy about response being positive so far :)

- the report doesn't seem to be correct on Kaufland, so that's a bit deceiving - https://matkoniecz.codeberg.page/improving_openstreetmap_using_alltheplaces_dataset/areas/50/14_index.html

which part seems to not be correct? note that my processing tries to make false negatives (avoid suggestions or import) rather than false positives

- I'd like to see a plaintext diff since osm.org and osmcha are not made for viewing sets of changesets. (not aware of a good tool) or script output that logs the changes being made

would plaintext list of tags modified would be good enough? ( locations of nodes were not changed by bot, nodes were not created, nodes were not added nor removed from ways, relation roles were not modified or added or removed etc)

- You are brave in using spaces in bot's name :)

This worked well, though code sits in directory path without any spaces :)

- I am happy you've included a QA section Martin

Thanks a lot, looks good. I think it would be good to have this kind of log for any kind of automated edit. Thanks again Mateusz for what you do. Sent with > Proton Mail <https://proton.me/mail/home>> secure email. On Wednesday, December 24th, 2025 at 4:40 AM, Mateusz Konieczny via talk-cz <talk-cz na openstreetmap.org> wrote:

https://pastebin.com/axchy8yw>>  should have listing you requested if any other data is needed - feel free to ask! Dec 11, 2025, 12:29 by talk-cz na openstreetmap.org:

Sorry, regarding the report, I misunderstood, it shows only missing, not all matched which I was expecting. I think all the numbers you§d put on a Venn diagram would be useful to show. Yes, just plaintext. Something that could be checked or grepped without having to open up each node an a map, eg. n123456: +website:asdfg +opening_hours:12-34. I don't know if codeberg has runners but it would be could to have the script run as "action" and output log there and automatically saved and accessible. Just an idea - don't want to push you into some workflow that may not be practical in reality. Sent with >>> Proton Mail <https://proton.me/mail/home>>>> secure email. On Thursday, December 11th, 2025 at 12:03 AM, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz na tutanota.com> wrote:

Dec 10, 2025, 22:18 by talk-cz na openstreetmap.org:

I've looked into the documentation, data processing code and tests, and I am satisfied with the rigor you've put into. Thank you.

Thanks for replies and I am obviously happy about response being positive so far :)

the report doesn't seem to be correct on Kaufland, so that's a bit deceiving - >>>>> https://matkoniecz.codeberg.page/improving_openstreetmap_using_alltheplaces_dataset/areas/50/14_index.html

which part seems to not be correct? note that my processing tries to make false negatives (avoid suggestions or import) rather than false positives

I'd like to see a plaintext diff since osm.org and osmcha are not made for viewing sets of changesets. (not aware of a good tool) or script output that logs the changes being made

would plaintext list of tags modified would be good enough? ( locations of nodes were not changed by bot, nodes were not created, nodes were not added nor removed from ways, relation roles were not modified or added or removed etc)

You are brave in using spaces in bot's name :)

This worked well, though code sits in directory path without any spaces :)

I am happy you've included a QA section Martin