Problem with OSM Inspector License View/WTFE

Hello, I've come across a few weird things in OSMI License View - I was wondering how is it possible that in Prague there is a lot of "created" ways but their nodes seem ok. Take a look for example here: goo.gl/yANXl There is a building that was created by jkjk (decliner): http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/51137581 But the nodes seem ok, so let's take a look: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/652409854 http://wtfe.gryph.de/report/node/652409854 The creation of node (by jkjk) is marked as "harmless". 1) Why is not displayed the "harmless" status on OSMI? 2) Until know I thought that all v1 objects created by decliners will go away, but it seems (at least for nodes) the WTFE logic is different. 3) It's a bit funny that the v1 "taintiness" coming from the position of node is removed by v2 "changed position < 1m" (harmless contribution). Is this really OK from the copyright and license point of view? Best regards, Petr Morávek aka Xificurk

Hello, I've come across a few weird things in OSMI License View - I was wondering how is it possible that in Prague there is a lot of "created" ways but their nodes seem ok. Take a look for example here: goo.gl/yANXl There is a building that was created by jkjk (decliner): http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/51137581 But the nodes seem ok, so let's take a look: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/652409854 http://wtfe.gryph.de/report/node/652409854 The creation of node (by jkjk) is marked as "harmless". 1) Why is not displayed the "harmless" status on OSMI? 2) Until know I thought that all v1 objects created by decliners will go away, but it seems (at least for nodes) the WTFE logic is different. 3) It's a bit funny that the v1 "taintiness" coming from the position of node is removed by v2 "changed position < 1m" (harmless contribution). Is this really OK from the copyright and license point of view? Best regards, Petr Morávek aka Xificurk